Search:
Login:
OR

Dispensaries

Garden Grove drops pot dispensary ban, starts registration

Category: Dispensaries | Posted on Wed, July, 20th 2011 by THCFinder
GARDEN GROVE – Medical marijuana dispensaries must register with the city or they will not be able to operate, according to a new ordinance passed by council members Tuesday night.
The City Council voted 5-0 in favor of the ordinance, which city officials say will not only help regulate the number of pot dispensaries in the city but also ensure that they are located in commercial zones as opposed to residential or school zones.
 
Garden Grove city council members unanimously passed an ordinance, which will require all medical marijuana dispensaries in the city to be registered in order to operate. The city estimates that there are about 30 dispensaries currently operating in Garden Grove despite a ban that was passed in 2008.
 
Senior Planner Erin Webb said the ordinance will go into effect immediately and only those dispensaries that have registered with the city can be potentially eligible for a future permit. About 30 medical marijuana dispensaries are operating in Garden Grove, she said. The ordinance will also effectively deter illegal operations from sprouting in different parts of the city, she said.
 
Council members said they support the registration process.
 
"This is needed for our city to have some control over the facilities and to make sure our children and families are protected from illegal activities," said Councilwoman Dina Nguyen. "Unless we define what is legal or illegal, it will not be possible for police to enforce the law."
Longtime resident Verla Lambert asked the council how the city intends to enforce the ordinance.
 
"With more business licenses, the city will get more revenue," she said. "But you will also need to hire more people to enforce these codes. We've worked hard to keep this environment drug-free. If it has to be done, we better do it right."
 

Comments

Valley 'Dispensaries' growing in popularity

Category: Dispensaries | Posted on Tue, July, 19th 2011 by THCFinder
PHOENIX - A legal battle is brewing over so-called pot clubs that have popped up in the wake of Arizona's new medical marijuana law.
 
Both sides of the debate have asked for legal opinions on whether the clubs can and should be allowed to operate.
 
The 2811 Club located near 28th Avenue and Bell Road in Phoenix has already attracted 200 members.
 
Paul O'Connor joined the club because he says his chronic leg pain goes away after using medical marijuana.
 
"It took the pain completely from my legs," said O'Connor. "I'm having pain in my stomach, it took the pain from my stomach."
 
The 2811 Club is named after the Arizona state statute that allows card carrying patients to exchange medical marijuana amongst one another.
 
"Arizona revised statutes clearly says one patient can transfer marijuana to another so long as there's nothing exchanged of value," said The 2811 Club Manager Al Sobel.
 
People who have their card pay a one time $25 membership fee and a $75 admission charge to the club each visit.
 
In exchange, they receive a free sample of medical marijuana from people who've donated it, up to 2.5 ounces in weight
 
"(The donors) usually have a lot of excess marijuana so they bring it here and distribute it to any member who wants it," said Sobel.
 
Will Humble, Director of Arizona's Department of Health Services tells ABC15 the club looks suspicious.
 
Humble likens it to a shell game focused on skirting the true intention of the law.
 
"It doesn't look legal to me," said Humble.
 
The club's managers and members disagree.
 
O'Connor says it provides a valuable service to people like him who really need it.
 
"The government is looking at it and saying this is just way for potheads to get high," said O'Connor.  "It's not."
 
(Source) 

Comments

S.F. Medical Marijuana Dispensaries Generate Only 11 Complaints in Five Years

Category: Dispensaries | Posted on Fri, July, 15th 2011 by THCFinder

Pot clubs. They're boring. You go in, you buy some pot, you leave. For all the clamor a new medical cannabis dispensary's opening receives from jumpy John Q. Public, with a few notable exceptions, most we see these days resemble dentists' offices, not dens of iniquity (and, we suspect, the drugs in dentists' offices are more fun, if you're into that kind of thing). 

Know what's even more boring? Reading the list of citizen complaints San Francisco's medical cannabis dispensaries have generated over the past few years. 

SF Weekly recently asked the Department of Public Health, which oversees the city's dispensary program, for a compendium of recent problems with the city's cannabis collectives. And we received it: A grand total of 11 complaints on file over a five-year period, according to the documents we received from our public records request.

2007: Canna Med Care on Sutter Street -- since closed -- was using a scale that was off by .4 grams. In a separate complaint filed that year, a neighbor on Dore Alley says that HopeNet's customers were blocking the sidewalk. HopeNet asked not to block the sidewalk. Also, workers at 1525 Howard Street complain that the smell from Emmalyn's is too much. DPH visits but can't detect a scent.

2008: The bathroom at HopeNet wasn't working. It was working when DPH visited. Another complaint said that outside of 442 Haight Street (now a shoe store) the presence of a "known drug dealer" alarmed a neighbor who later sees people smoking pot outside the establishment on two separate occasions. That matter was referred to SFPD.

2009 was the dirty year: Green Goddess at 940 Geary Street was selling pot without a permit. Also, 194 Church Street was doing the same thing. Both operations were shut down.

2010: Grassroots on Post Street was selling more than an ounce per visit, in violation of city rules. Told not to do it anymore. Another complaint said that a man on Palm Avenue in Laurel Heights upset his neighbors by making cannabis lollipops in his kitchen. He said he'll stop.

2011: A man who claims to have top-security clearance from the United States government says he was assaulted outside of SPARC, and that he received harassing e-mails and phone calls following "a traumatic brain injury."

Had enough? So have we. Suffice to say that San Francisco medical cannabis dispensaries are hardly the most threatening entities in town. In fact, we believe that the local Pet Food Express has generated more contention

But this comes as no surprise to cannabis advocates -- it's what they've been saying for years, in fact.

 

(Sourcehttp://blogs.sfweekly.com


Comments

Marijuana shop near Fullerton school closed

Category: Dispensaries | Posted on Fri, July, 15th 2011 by THCFinder
A marijuana dispensary operating about 300 feet from a Fullerton elementary school has been forced to shut down because of its proximity to the campus and other violations, police said Friday.
 
Neighbors of the Green Parrot dispensary complained to Fullerton police that it was operating illegally just yards from Raymond Elementary School in the Orange County suburb, said Fullerton police Lt. Andrew Goodrich.
 
Goodrich said the Green Parrot, in the 1000 block of East Chapman Boulevard, was investigated by narcotics investigators for a variety of violations, including operating without a permit, no business license and operating within 600 feet of a school.
 
Green Parrot owner Derek Gonzalez, 21, of Wildomar, Calif., received a citation for the violations.
 
Goodrich said the store had about 400 medical marijuana customers. Gonzales agreed to close his business, according to Goodrich.
The city also cited the building owner’s for code violations.
 
“Marijuana dispensaries, collectives and cooperatives are not allowed to operate within the city of Fullerton," Goodrich said.
 

Comments

Danville moves to permanently ban medical marijuana dispensaries

Category: Dispensaries | Posted on Wed, July, 13th 2011 by THCFinder
DANVILLE -- The Town Council is moving toward a permanent ban on marijuana dispensaries.
 
The council, with member Newell Arnerich absent, discussed the issue Tuesday. No formal vote was taken, but the other members -- Mayor Karen Stepper, Candace Andersen, Robert Storer and Mike Doyle -- directed the town's staff to draft a resolution to ban dispensaries. City Attorney Rob Ewing said it would likely come to the council in September for adoption.
 
"I don't know why we would change what we're doing," Stepper said.
 
Andersen said she has seen evidence of the medicinal qualities of marijuana but would want to see it distributed by pharmacies instead of dispensaries where she said there is potential for abuse.
 
The decision was the latest in the town's attempts to discourage the opening of medical marijuana dispensaries. In October 2009, the council adopted a 45-day "interim urgency" ordinance banning dispensaries. Later extensions will continue the ban only until Oct. 6. The town had hoped legal issues regarding the ability of towns to ban dispensaries would be settled by now, but Ewing said it still remains unclear.
 
Danville cannot extended its temporary ban again, so the town had to decide what direction to take.
 
Ewing said other cities have adopted permanent bans, with some targeted by lawsuits that claim a broad ban -- at least applied to collectives and cooperatives -- is pre-empted by state law. So far, none of the suits have been successful, he said.
Danville's other option would be to let the current moratorium expire and wait for further legal clarification.
 
Meanwhile, the town could have tried relying on its general plan and zoning ordinances, which prohibit uses inconsistent with state and federal law.
 
A third option was to adopt a zoning regulation that would allow dispensaries with strict controls, such as requiring they be a certain distance from schools and parks.
 

Comments

Sheriff Mims proposes to eliminate medical marijuana dispensaries

Category: Dispensaries | Posted on Tue, July, 12th 2011 by THCFinder
FRESNO, Calif. (KFSN) -- Medical marijuana dispensaries in Fresno County could be a thing of the past if Sheriff Margaret Mims gets her way. The county supervisors will discuss a proposal Tuesday aimed at eliminating most of these collectives.
 
Sheriff Mims put a 20 page report on the agenda for the Board of Sups meeting. Supporters say it will help the Sheriffs Office control the cultivation of medical marijuana in Fresno County while critics say the ordinance makes it nearly impossible for anyone qualify and grow the plant.
 
Under the new ordinance proposal -- medical marijuana collectives like the one at Tarpey Village will cease to exist. And anyone who wants to grow pot legally will have six months to do so in the industrial area of Fresno County, where they'll be at least a thousand feet away from schools, parks, and churches.
 
Supervisor Henry Perea says the ordinance will help stop illegitimate grows taking place all over the county. "Really what I think it's turned into is a lot of criminal activity that has taken advantage of a law that was intended to help people. And we're going to put a stop to that in Fresno County." said Perea.
 
"We're trying to strike that balance. Yes if you have a medical need and we're going to make sure that need is met for you but at the same token we're not going to let the criminal element profit off of that either." said Perea.
 

Comments


Search








Blog Categories

Popular Articles

Latest Offers In Your Area
Recent Blog Posts
Download Our App!
13.4 Miles Away | Los Angeles ,
16.2 Miles Away | Agoura Hills ,
8.6 Miles Away | West Hollywood ,
December 22, 2014 | Category: Dispensaries
December 22, 2014 | Category: Nugs
December 22, 2014 | Category: Tokers
Mobile Apps
Copyright 2014 THCFinder.com
All Rights Reserved.
Dispensaries      Strains      About Us      Friends      API / Widgets      Privacy Policy      Terms of Use      Investors      Contact Us