Marijuana Collective Members in Court
Category: Medical Marijuana | Posted on Fri, July, 29th 2011 by THCFinder
When will this madness and nonsense stop? Harassing workers is going above and beyond any rational thinking of shutting down dispensaries as if that is not bad enough to begin with.
It's the first case of it's kind in Butte County. Three members of a marijuana collective, raided last year, pleaded "not guilty" today to the felony charges against them. Eight dispensaries in the Chico area were raided June 30th.. Mountainside Patient Collective was one of them. And although the three who appeared in court today are the first to face charges, the District Attorney's office says they won't be the last.
Jason Anderson, Michael Anderson, and Kaitlin Sanchez are facing several felony charges for providing medical marijuana to patients in Butte County. They are the three members of the Mountainside Patients Collective, one of eight dispensaries raided last June.. And the first to appear in court.
"The legislation that allows collectives and cooperatives is very clear that you can only cultivate. You cannot sell, you cannot distribute," District Attorney Mike Ramsey says.
According to Prop 215 marijuana possession and cultivation is allowed for personal medical use only, and by no means is it available for sales.. Even if its labeled a 'non-profit' by the collective. It also states that only seriously ill patients have the right to medical cannibus. Those with cancer or aids for example. "Seventy percent of their membership was under the age of 30.. These are supposedly seriously ill folks," says Ramsey.
Bay Area cannabis activist Mickey Martin is a personal friend of the Andersons. His argument...What about those who are unable to grow medical marijuana themselves. Like those who are too ill or living in apartment complexes with not enough space. "People who do live in apartments, do count on collectives and other people to grow their medicine for them because there's just no space," Martin says.
Martin also believes the time and money spent to prepare for the raid could have been spent elsewhere. As he says, instead of attacking these medical providers. "There's a lot of people who need this medicine and the people who are willing to stand on the front lines and provide it, don't deserve to be dragged through court.."
But in the coming months, the D.A.'s office plans to file several other charges against others involved with the dispensaries raided last summer. Ramsey says, "They have a sham legal existence. They're selling marijuana. They are really nothing more than marijuana stores."
The Mountainside Patients Collective trial date has been set for September 26th.
Free pot in exchange for registering to vote?
Category: Medical Marijuana | Posted on Thu, July, 28th 2011 by THCFinder
A medical marijuana shop's offer of free pot in exchange for registering to vote appears to have gone up in smoke.
Your Healthy Choice Clinic of Lansing, Mich., had been offering a half gram on its website ahead of a vote for city council seats and after the council approved capping the number of medical marijuana dispensaries within city limits and setting a $1,000 application fee.
Clinic owner Shekina Pena earlier said she wasn't trying to buy votes.
"We really got to fight to get the voters out there because the polls are showing there's 4-5,000 people in Lansing that are patients or caregivers," she told NBC affiliate WILX TV. "So we need those 4-5,000 people to come forth to the polls and vote for whomever they feel is in support of what they want for access."
"We let them know how we feel, we don't tell them who to vote for," she added. "We definitely want to support the ones (city council members) who are supporting us."
On Wednesday, the state's attorney general, at the prodding of a state senator, said he was looking into whether the clinic crossed a legal line.
Lansing City Clerk Chris Swope said if the clinic tied the offer to voting for or against a particular person then it would definitely have crossed the legal line.
Pena insisted that wasn't the case, but Swope still had concerns that a line might have been crossed, noting that a website tagline — "Vote for us and we'll vote for you." — suggested a close tie to candidates.
A clinic employee contacted by msnbc.com on Thursday had "no comment" on whether the website offer still stood, and Pena had not yet returned a call seeking clarification.
Seattle mayor signing medical marijuana law
Category: Medical Marijuana | Posted on Wed, July, 27th 2011 by THCFinder
Seattle Mayor Mike McGinn scheduled a signing ceremony Wednesday with the city attorney and other officials to sign a bill regulating medical marijuana like any other business.
The bill passed July 18 by the city council requires that medical marijuana operations be licensed, obtain food-handling permits if they sell marijuana cookies, and follow all other regulations such as land use codes.
The approach contrasts with several other cities in Washington that have imposed moratoriums on such operations.
Medical marijuana regulations in the state have been uncertain since Gov. Chris Gregoire vetoed much of a bill that would have created a system of licensed medical marijuana dispensaries. She left in sections allowing collective medical marijuana operations.
BCCLA slams medical marijuana reforms
Category: Medical Marijuana | Posted on Wed, July, 27th 2011 by THCFinder
The federal government’s plan to reform Health Canada’s medical marijuana program is not dope, says the B.C. Civil Liberties Association.
Last month, the federal government launched a public consultation on proposed amendments to the program, following a recent Ontario court decision that struck down the program as unconstitutional.
Currently, people seeking marijuana for medical purposes must first get a declaration from a licensed medical practitioner before they can apply to Health Canada for authorization to possess pot. Existing regulations also allow authorized patients or a designated person to get a licence to grow their own medical marijuana.
Under the proposed changes, doctors would directly authorize patients to use medical marijuana and patients would have to purchase it from commercial producers licensed by Health Canada.
But BCCLA’S Micheal Vonn said Health Canada’s proposal is heading in the wrong direction.
“Patients have a constitutional right to access (medical marijuana) without fear of criminal prosecution,” she said.
The BCCLA is also calling for the development of a “non-profit or price-regulated production and distribution system” based on the “compassion clubs” model.
Dana Larsen, director of the Vancouver Dispensary Society, said he would like to see dispensaries brought into the program because they have the ability to work with producers and growers, offer organic-quality product and provide one-on-one consultation and education.
Marijuana Derivative May Offer Hope in Cocaine Addiction
Category: Medical Marijuana | Posted on Tue, July, 26th 2011 by THCFinder
A new study in mice has found that activating a receptor affected by marijuana can dramatically reduce cocaine consumption. The research suggests that new anti-addiction drugs might be developed using synthetic versions of cannabidiol (CBD), the marijuana component that activates the receptor—or even by using the purified natural compound itself.
Researchers formerly believed that the receptor, known as CB2, was not found in the brain and that therefore CBD had no psychoactive effects. But a growing body of research suggests otherwise. After THC, CBD is the second most prevalent active compound in marijuana.
The study found that JWH133, a synthetic drug that activates the CB2 receptor, reduced intravenous cocaine administration in mice by 50-60%.
"It's a very significant reduction,” says Zheng-Xiong Xi, the lead author of the study and a researcher at the National Institute on Drug Abuse.
JWH133 comes with some other features that make it an attractive candidate as a potential anti-addiction treatment. It does not seem to produce either a high or a negative experience, which is critical if it is to become a useful and politically acceptable anti-addiction option. While mice given drugs like cocaine or heroin will spend more time in the place where they got high (apparently hoping for more), mice didn't develop such a “place preference” when given JWH133. Nor did they avoid the spot where they'd been given it, which happens when mice are given drugs they find unpleasant.
"It's extremely exciting,” says Antonello Bonci, scientific director for intramural research at the National Institute on Drug Abuse.
Cannabis Oil Fights Cancer
Category: Medical Marijuana | Posted on Mon, July, 25th 2011 by THCFinder
A number of recent studies have confirmed the cancer-fighting, tumor-shrinking value of medical marijuana.
Although the first study to demonstrate that cannabis has anti-carcinogenic properties was done back in 1974 by the U.S. National Institute of Health, more recent studies, which began abroad in 1999, have shown that cannabis can effectively and safely treat many forms of cancer.
Since 1999, there have now been a number of studies that clearly demonstrate that cannabis has the ability to effectively shrink tumors, kill cancer cells, and safely treat many aggressive forms of cancer, including brain, breast, skin, prostate, and lung cancer.
However, due to the political controversy that surrounds medical marijuana, some physicians still remain unaware of these valuable studies, and mistakenly believe the misguided government reports that cannabis actually causes cancer. In some cases, it may be important to educate your doctor about the important research discussed in this column.
A study done at UCLA in 2006 showed that not only does smoking marijuana not cause lung cancer, as had been previously thought, but that smoking cannabis actually protects the lungs from cancer. The study followed four groups of subjects: nonsmokers, cannabis-only smokers, tobacco-only smokers, and cannabis and tobacco smokers.
The results showed that nonsmokers and cannabis-only smokers had the same amount of lung cancer, and that tobacco-only smokers had the highest rate of lung cancer. Those subjects that smoked both cannabis and tobacco had significantly less lung cancer than those who just smoked tobacco. In other words, smoking cannabis actually had a protective effect on the tobacco smokers’ lungs.
- 186,857 Views Category: Odd
- 146,486 Views Category: Fun
- 136,556 Views Category: Culture
- 95,078 Views Category: Culture
- 94,688 Views Category: Fun
- 93,293 Views Category: Culture
- 75,478 Views Category: Culture
- 73,402 Views Category: Odd
- 65,590 Views Category: Fun
- 58,516 Views Category: Fun