Medical Marijuana

Cannabis Oil Fights Cancer

Category: Medical Marijuana | Posted on Mon, July, 25th 2011 by THCFinder
A number of recent studies have confirmed the cancer-fighting, tumor-shrinking value of medical marijuana. 
Although the first study to demonstrate that cannabis has anti-carcinogenic properties was done  back in 1974 by the U.S. National Institute of Health, more recent studies, which began abroad in 1999, have shown that cannabis can effectively and safely treat many forms of cancer. 
Since 1999, there have now been a number of studies that clearly demonstrate that cannabis has the ability to effectively shrink tumors, kill cancer cells, and safely treat many aggressive forms of cancer, including brain, breast, skin, prostate, and lung cancer. 
However, due to the political controversy that surrounds medical marijuana, some physicians still remain unaware of these valuable studies, and mistakenly believe the misguided government reports that cannabis actually causes cancer. In some cases, it may be important to educate your doctor about the important research discussed in this column.
A study done at UCLA in 2006 showed that not only does smoking marijuana not cause lung cancer, as had been previously thought, but that smoking cannabis actually protects the lungs from cancer. The study followed four groups of subjects: nonsmokers, cannabis-only smokers, tobacco-only smokers, and cannabis and tobacco smokers. 
The results showed that nonsmokers and cannabis-only smokers had the same amount of lung cancer, and that tobacco-only smokers had the highest rate of lung cancer. Those subjects that smoked both cannabis and tobacco had significantly less lung cancer than those who just smoked tobacco. In other words, smoking cannabis actually had a protective effect on the tobacco smokers’ lungs.


Half-baked pot plan in Chico unravels

Category: Medical Marijuana | Posted on Mon, July, 25th 2011 by THCFinder
Four city councilors wanted to provide something for medical marijuana users, but now the users may end up with nothing.
The City Council's plan to endorse two huge marijuana-growing operations in Chico is quickly unraveling. Wow, who saw that one coming?
Well the truth is, everyone, except the four city councilors who voted for it knew this would happen.
Ignoring the warnings of the Department of Justice, the Butte County district attorney, the police chief and the local police force, the council voted 4-3 on July 5 to allow two dispensaries where marijuana could be grown and distributed, each up to 10,000 square feet.
Before the council vote, the U.S. attorney for northeastern California sent a letter warning the councilors they were considering something that was unlawful in the federal government's eyes. It told them the consequences of breaking the law. Ann Schwab, Mark Sorensen and Bob Evans got the message and wisely voted against the dispensary ordinance.
Andy Holcombe, Mary Flynn, Scott Gruendl and Jim Walker shrugged off the threat and approved the ordinance.
Since then, the U.S. attorney invited City Manager Dave Burkland, Police Chief Mike Maloney and City Attorney Lori Barker down for a little talk.
Those three probably already knew the council's idea was a bad one, but the federal prosecutor drove home the message.
They needed to find a delicate way to tell four councilors that they need to rethink their idea.
Police officers were not so delicate.
The officers union came out Friday and said flat-out they wouldn't help enable people who are breaking federal law.
It's the first time we can remember a local police force telling elected officials they wouldn't enforce one of their ideas.
The council is expected to discuss the matter again at its Aug. 2 meeting. Councilors would be wise to quickly backtrack.
They know that only two cities in the U.S. attorney's entire district got warning letters, though others have allowed dispensaries.
Those two cities were Isleton and Chico.
Both approved enormous, city-sanctioned marijuana growing facilities.
Even if the council decides to allow small-scale dispensaries, just to get off the U.S. attorney's radar, there's another problem: The police force still probably wouldn't ignore federal law and look the other way.
The council's missteps may mean that, instead of doing a favor for medical marijuana supporters who want "access to medicine," those people may end up with nothing.


Chico POA won't enforce city's medical marijuana dispensary law

Category: Medical Marijuana | Posted on Fri, July, 22nd 2011 by THCFinder
Stupid is as stupid does I guess....
CHICO — The Chico Police Officers' Association executive board said today it will not enforce the city's medical marijuana dispensary ordinance.
The association planned to deliver letters to council members today stating that the ordinance allowing for two dispensaries conflicts with federal law.
"Our only option is this. The members of the Chico Police Officers' Association will not participate in any part of the medical marijuana ordinance that involves commercial marijuana growing or selling operations," the letter reads.
"We will not assist in any way in any activity that normalizes, standardizes, expedites or assists in the establishment of facilities set up for the commercial growing and selling of marijuana.
"It is our sworn duty to enforce all laws regarding controlled substances and we will continue to do so."


Medical marijuana group claims more than 2,000 signatures for referendum in 7 days

Category: Medical Marijuana | Posted on Thu, July, 21st 2011 by THCFinder
HELENA -- In just a week, some 2,000 Montanans have signed petitions to let voters in 2012 to decide the fate of the more restrictive medical marijuana law enacted this year, referendum backers said Tuesday.
A group called Patients for Reform - Not Repeal recently launched a statewide campaign seeking enough signatures to place Senate Bill 423 on the ballot next year. If it obtains an additional level of signatures by Sept. 30, the law will be suspended until voters in November 2012 decide whether to retain or reject the statute
The referendum and lawsuit are a two-pronged attack by some medical marijuana businesses and patients.
In addition, a separate effort announced last week by Barb Crego, medical marijuana patient from East Helena, has plans for a constitutional initiative to decriminalize medical marijuana. Backers of the referendum and lawsuit said they are not involved in the proposed decriminalization constitutional initiative.
The Montana Cannabis Industry Association and others challenged the constitutionality of the new law in court.
On June 30, District Judge James Reynolds of Helena temporarily blocked some key parts from taking effect until a full hearing is held. One enjoined provision would have prevented growers from charging patients for supplying them with medical marijuana, while another would have limited the number of patients each provider could grow pot for.
"The temporary injunction is just that," said Rose Habib of Missoula, petitioning coordinator for Patients for Reform - Not Repeal, citing the need for the referendum.
So far, Habib said she's trained more than 150 "core volunteers," who in turn have taught 500 additional volunteers on how to gather signatures correctly. More than 1,500 other people have volunteered, she said.
Local election officials must verify that those signing the petitions are registered voters so they count.
"It's the largest gathering of volunteers I've ever seen in the 20-plus years I've worked on initiatives," said C.B. Pearson, a Missoula consultant assisting the group.


Marijuana treatment sought for chronic PTSD sufferers

Category: Medical Marijuana | Posted on Wed, July, 20th 2011 by THCFinder
Researchers are seeking federal approval for what is believed to be the first study to examine the therapeutic effects of marijuana on veterans with chronic post-traumatic stress disorder, according to a report in The New York Times.
The proposal, from the Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies in Santa Cruz, Calif., and a researcher at the University of Arizona College of Medicine, would look at the potential benefits of cannabis by examining 50 combat veterans who have not responded to other treatment, the paper reported Monday.
“These are people whom we put in harm’s way, and we have a moral obligation to help them,” Rick Doblin, founder and executive director of the psychedelic studies group, was quoted as saying.
In April, the Food and Drug Administration said it was satisfied that safety concerns over the study had been addressed by Doblin and Dr. Sue Sisley, an assistant professor of psychiatry and internal medicine at Arizona, according to a letter from the FDA provided to the Times by Doblin, but noted there are other hurdles, such as where the marijuana would come from.
One Army veteran from Texas who fought in Iraq for 18 months beginning in 2006, told the Times that he used marijuana three times a day in lieu of the prescribed painkillers and antidepressants. He asked that his name not be used because Texas does not allow medical marijuana.
“I have seen it with my own eyes,” he told the paper. “It works for a lot of the guys coming home.”
If the study is approved, veterans would be given up to 1.8 grams, or about three marijuana cigarettes, a day to treat anxiety, depression, nightmares and other symptoms brought on by PTSD, the Times wrote.


Seattle passes bill regulating medical pot shops

Category: Medical Marijuana | Posted on Tue, July, 19th 2011 by THCFinder
Setting up a possible confrontation with the federal government, the City Council on Monday passed a new law that establishes a regulatory framework for the growing number of medical marijuana dispensaries in Seattle.
The City Council unanimously passed its own ordinance because efforts to address medical marijuana, which is legal in Washington, foundered earlier this year in Olympia.
"How did we get here? The upshot is, (dispensaries are) here and we should regulate them," City Councilwoman Sally Clark said before the vote.
The ordinance, sponsored by Councilman Nick Licata, requires medical marijuana dispensaries to obtain a business license, pay taxes and fees and meet city land use codes. They would also be subject to the requirements of the city's "Chronic Nuisance Property Law," meaning if there are repeated complaints about activity at the establishments they could face fines or possible closure. The "open use and display of cannabis" would also be prohibited at the dispensaries.
Clark said in the coming months the Council would come up with zoning rules for the businesses - deciding where they can locate and where they would be banned. Dispensaries have opened in Ballard, Capitol Hill and SoDo, to name just a few neighborhoods. "For now, we're trying to provide as much clarity as we can," she said.
Phillip Dawdy, an advocate for changes to marijuana laws who spoke in favor the city ordinance. "At the end of the day it's patients that are going to be left out in the cold and pushed on the market if municipalities don't start dealing with this," he said.
The state Legislature had passed a medical pot bill, but Gov. Chris Gregoire rejected most of it. She said she worried the legislation put state workers at risk of federal prosecution.



Blog Categories

Popular Articles

Latest Offers In Your Area
Recent Blog Posts
Download Our App!
10 Miles Away | Los Angeles,
10 Miles Away | Los Angeles,
29.5 Miles Away | La Puente, West,
January 22, 2017 | Category: Fun
January 22, 2017 | Category: News
January 22, 2017 | Category: Videos
Mobile Apps
Copyright 2017
All Rights Reserved.
Dispensaries      Strains      About Us      Friends      API / Widgets      Privacy Policy      Terms of Use      Investors      Contact Us